Proposal Essay – Organ Selling

While walking d avouch a city street, alarming cries for help ring push through through the air, and it is observed that an mortal that appears to be living well has a helpless, poor victim held down, relentlessly beating them to the ground and taking what little they have left for their own advantage and benefit. What would be the right thing to do run off or try to help, either by stepping in or art the proper authorities? The mor eithery ethical thing to do would be to help and do what has to be done to stand up for what is right.This comparable general scenario is happening not too far from this country, where electric organ brokers atomic number 18 victimizing innocent and poverty-stricken mothers and fathers trying to find a dash to proffer and get pop of debt, by either forcing or deceiving them to give up an organ or cheating them whether formally or informally, after they concord to sell, by either not paying them for their organ at all or only paying a fraction of the promised price (Glaser, S.,2005).But the commission that nobody tries to help is the alike as walking by that same victim that is being beaten on the street. These poor victimized sellers that be turning to that option, unfortunately are completely ignorant to and unschoold on the process, certain variety meat in their bodies, or any of the functions or splendor of those organs which leaves them wide open to exploitation.Therefore, my proposal is to find a way to stop these horrible things from happening to the electric potential and desperate sellers, by educating them, expectant them other means that help both those who are nameking monetary gain by selling, and those who desperately are seeking an organ to survive, and eliminating them from the dull market organ brokers manipulation and exploitative grasp. It is respectfully understood that the existence Health Organization (WHO) is strongly against any payment for any suit of organ donation for a number of mo ral, ethical, and medical reasons (Denneman, L., Mol, M. 2009).For instance, as utter in the WHOs Guiding Principles on Human Organ graftingation (1991), organ trafficking violates fundamental human rights, such as rights to life, liberty, security in person and freedom from cruel and inhumane treatment(Glaser, S. 2005). Further more, it may be a risk to the earthly concern in addition to being a crime that, in this particular case, proves to be a conspicuously sickish violation of human rights, because the forcing and misleading of whateverone into selling their body separate violates their personal independence (Glaser, S.2005).Moreover, risklessty standards in these areas are severely undermined imputable to the lack of resources, weak medical regulatory foundation, and corruption at that placefore, if there were to be a legalized method of organ buying and selling, the regulatory structures and corpse would be ineffectively executed (Denneman, L. , Mol, M. 2009). So, on e can empathetically concur with the WHOs decision to stand firm on the banning.Anthropologist, Monir Moniruzzaman, found 33 sellers who went to organ brokers to sell their kidneys, not correct knowing what the word kidney meant nor what its purpose and functions in the body were, and were talked into doing it because of the misleading, false information they have of their sleeping kidney and the 100% safe procedure that had no risks and would cause no long-term harm or damage to them then were promised over two thirds more than they actually received (Moniruzzaman, M.2012).These people, who lived on only $2 per day to provide for a family and lived in the worst imaginable impoverished conditions, some in a go space located under someone elses house (Bienstock, R. E. 2013). They see thousands of luring ads in local newspapers, promising them the world, and out of fear, hope, and desperation reach out to the organ brokers and get sucked into go for and at times physically coerce to donate (Parry, W. 2012).If there were a strictly regulated legal system with fixed prices that these desperately poverty-stricken people can go to enquire questions, get true, accurate answers and information, and completely and independently decide to sell. This may be the solution to wipe out these brokers of the black market because if they have no one to prey on they will not have a choice but to find other means of income besides taking a large portion of the sellers payments for hidden fees (Resnick, B.2012).Since the WHO is not, in any way, sack to lift the ban, and one of the most efficient ways to increase the put out of available organs for the thousands of people on organ waiting lists is to mother some form of donation and selling legal, other options must be sought-after. By combining two opposingview tears it is possible for a all new approach to this rapidly growing problem to transpire, for there may be more agreeable aspects than what meets the eye. Though there are areas of disagreement, it is agree upon that exploiting the poor and manipulating and/or forcing them to sell their organs at the expense of their wellness physically and psychologically, and social stance as well as the sellers families also.Instead of termination against beliefs of any party by lifting the ban or just dissembling that this does not occur on a daily basis or ignore it entirely, not trying to help, it may be possible to educate these poor and desperate people, crack down on busting these organ brokers, and even getting the doctors involved in the protection and prevention of the innocent victims that this pitiful system continues to claim. The ethical and moral urgency to protect these peoples rights, freedom, health, and autonomy is equally important, so it should be the main(prenominal) focal point for a new elimination program.This could consist of passing and strictly and gratingly enforcing police forces against such crimes related to illegal t rafficking, and in the process organize public education campaigns to get the proper and accurate information out to the victims and potential sellers so these brokers that do not get caught are unable to bunco and force them to sell out of ignorance (Glaser, S. 2005). These awareness programs and information centers could then, in turn, create some jobs and give those living in drastic poverty some form of income.These developments will require total cooperation and collaboration from both he3alth officials and law enforcement officials equally (Halstead, B. , Wilson, P. 1991). One way would be to pass the law majestic mandatory reporting requirements for doctors who suspect that the organs were obtained employ the black market. Currently, transplant doctors work on a dont ask, dont tell regimen, which is fueling the brokers to continue luring in more sellers.Since it is the brokers who are the main culprits, it should be them, not doctors, that are pursued, convicted, and be g iven a more severe punishment (Glaser, S. 2005). In addition to stopping the organ brokers there are a number of other methods that can be carried out to develop an increasing supply of organs, such as promoting consent to stiff donations upon death, altruistic donations, biotechnology, and/or using tissues and stem cells from aborted fetuses to create the needed organs (Holstead, B. , Wilson,P. 1991).There are a number of options presented and if it is not possible to legalize the sales agreement of organs, completely dissipate the black market, or stop people from using the black market out of desperation for either money or the needed organ, then the way the people are misinformed, uneducated, and exploited, blindly consenting by way of violence and/or manipulation needs to be promptly addressed by carefully and thoughtfully considering getting the knowledge, law enforcement, strict punishments, and health officials help out and start standing up for the innocent victims.Just a s one would help if he saw a victim lying in front of him, beaten and bloody in the street, it would be imperative and morally right to lend a support hand.