Conviction of Louise Woodward

In this essay i will be writing and explaining how intercommunicate language is officed and adapted to influence the panel in the block blood that convicted Louise Woodward. The prosecuting officer uses a variety of features in this argument to win over the jury persecute Louse Woodward. I will be passing through these techniques and explaining why he uses them to influence the jury. Gerard T Leone Jr was the prosecuting officer in the case of the death of Mathew Eappen. He uses repeat in the first component of the argument by repeating the victim name, Mathew Eappen. The repetitions show that he wants the jury to focus his attention on the victim. He wants the jury to feel emotionally connected to Mathew Eappen so it would affect the decision the jury makes. The repetition of Mathew Eappen encourages the acceptance of the idea that he was young and already dead because of Louise Woodward. It gives Mathew and the judgeship hatful a mutual bond. He talk almost Mathew Eappe n by aphorism the things he hasnt done to make the court feel pardon toward him by saying that Mathew Eappen will never take his first step. Mathew Eappen will never say his first forge because Mathew Eappen is dead. An additional font of repetition is when the repeats the word explodes when he talks nigh how the victims actually died. He repeats and uses this word as he is expected to use powerful language to induce the jury and the word explodes has imagery so when he says Matties judgment explodes people visualise this shocking image. This is effective because he could become substantially put up pictures of the wound merely by making the interview visualise it, in some people minds the wound might face more serious and horrifying than it was actually in real life.Another use of imagery is when he talk ab come out of the closet the size of the wound . He doesnt use an adjective or a simile but uses the name of an object to represent the wounds. In this mount he uses a gooses egg. He says in form of a rhetorical pass that she would have seen that goose egg on the back of his corpus. He uses a goose egg because when you visualise it is very unconvincing and easily broken so this is referring to poor Matties skull and that fact it uses a gooses egg over a daily , normal chicken eggs that this wasnt a ordinary crack but bigger more sever crack which unfortunately cost Mathew Eappen his life.A technique that he uses is chaff during the last section of the speech is that convicted Louise Woodward. Gerard talk about the testimony Louise gave about the death of Mathew Eappen. She saying the testimony that she popped Mathew on the floor but he replies by saying that the word popped vigorouss like the word dropped, that the words popped sounds a little lie tossed. This is sarcastic because he wants the people to know for original that Louise dropped Mathew Eappen which cause his head to explode. His using sarcasm to tell the jury that Louise Woodwa rd is fineable without tell the jury and court directly that she is guilty. This is effective because not is he accusing her indirectly but he is confirming that the injuries were caused by Louise Woodward. The prosecutor uses many rhetorical questions through out the argument because these make the audition think and have time to answer the questions in the minds even judgment Gerard T Leone is not asking for an answer he is giving question after question so the audience can think about them and find out the point he is trying to make.In the middle of the argument he shows this by saying Dont you think she would have seen that goose egg on the back of his head? Dont you think she would have preceded some swelling, some injury to the back of Mathew guide? Another example of him using a rhetorical question is when he says Why would Sergeant Detective Bill Burn lie? causality marine twenty five years on the force. In this context he uses a rhetorical question that is leading so the court will automati surroundy think that what Bill Burn said wasnt a lie .The question is leading because he follows the question with cause marine twenty five years on the force. This makes Bill sound trustworthy and Louise Woodward guiltier. Using rhetorical questions is great because as a prosecutor you would expect them to question the case and use rhetorical question to convert the court men. The prosecutor has used a variety of techniques through out his argument to convince the jury to convict Louise Woodward. I believe this is a great piece of spoken language as well as having many features the prosecutor is adding emotion and moods by changing some words.A example of this is when he says She was bathing Mattie like she was supposed to, he uses the name Mattie sooner of Mathew because it signifies how young he was and Mattie is the name that the people with the closest relationship would call him such as his parent, so by calling him Mattie he is creating sorrowfulness and pity by talking about the loss of someone so loved. Overall this is a very convincing argument and is structured guardedly so all details correspond with each other creating an set up power and strong argument.